Thursday, October 23, 2008

Is New York becoming Paris?

DSC02542 Stitch

It was a nice day yesterday; appointments had not materialized, so I had time to wander New York a bit and see some of the areas around Midtown that I hadn’t had enough time to really explore before.  I visited the top of Rockefeller Center (beautiful views (above), cold wind, and trying to sell you something at every turn) and the Trump Tower (always trying to sell something, DSC02531 period (right)); Central Park and Times Square, of course, and a bit of shopping up and down the streets.

I like it a lot, its a wonderful city.  I was thinking about it’s future, though.  In many respects, it seems like the city is still absorbed by the mythology associated with it’s own past.  The monuments and landmarks are all cleaned up and highlighted, and their stories are told and retold at every tour, placard, and shop window.  There isn’t sense of being at the center of creating a future though: no areas that are setting the style, technology, social trends, or business models that the world will copy tomorrow.  Indeed, the elevator and street conversations that I overhear are more quiet shock and whispered fears of markets and jobs.

DSC02498DSC02539

A local radio show host was asked if New York bonds are a safe buy: he had the opinion that the city had become a national shrine in the wake of 9/11 and no state or national government would allow it to fail.  Local theaters are doing brisk business in plays based on the French Revolution, including Les Miz and A Tale of Two Cities (the Musical).

All of which reminded me of an article that I’d read on the web about Paris: City of Museums or Museum City.

In it, the author acknowledged that Paris is a “magnificent city that boasts incomparable assets…

And yet, for a world capital, there is no buzz.

Mayor Bertrand DelanoƩ is accused of turning the French capital into a "sacred" city where stringent regulations prevent a natural evolution of the city.

Many of my friends believe Paris has long ceased to be an influential city where tomorrow’s artistic trends are conceived and launched. It no longer represents an attractive option for creators who prefer the excitement and vibes of other capitals.

DSC02505

New York, too, seems quiet in somewhat the same way, and in the grip of some of the same constraints.  As I walk, I wonder, will it evolve in the same way, losing the vibrancy that made it a wonder and beacon for much of the last century.

DSC02541

5 comments:

Tale of Two Cities Musical said...

Hi,
I thought you might be interested in another “Tale of Two Cities Musical” that is wending it's way to Broadway (Perhaps via Boston). This one has a distinctively low budget so far but a very singable score and an engaging book. You might want to check out some of the songs. http://www.taleoftwocitiesmusical.com/

Textual Healer said...

Enjoy the big apple - whether it be rotten or just petrified. Did your flat in Maastricht come through?

nick said...

I had the same feeling in July that NYC isn't spearheading the future, that it's stuck in a bit of a rut. I thought Chicago had more of a creative buzz about it. NYC was little different from when we visited 12 years back - perhaps the destruction of the World Trade Centre took the wind out of everyone's sails.

Dave Hampton said...

The version that I went to was not the same one: I went to A Tale of Two Cities The Musical
http://www.talemusical.com/
and enjoyed it a lot. There were half-price tickets available through the TKTS booth in Times Square, and good seats by going to the matinee using that route.

The story was good (I avoided reading the book in high school), and after a bit of rushed exposition in teh first few scenes, the pace settled down nicely. James Barbour was a strong and sympathetic lead actor, with a great voice and able to convey his character's many inner layers and conflicts. The reviews of the musical were not good (most compared it unfavorably to Les Miz) but I like a big Broadway musical.

Dave Hampton said...

More petrified in some regards, TH: I agree with Nick that 9/11 may have taken some of the edge off of it. But it seemed like something more as well, maybe a sense of looking more to the past than the future, or a self-conscious awareness of it's recent symbolism, or a maturity, or a sense that it's best days may not be ahead any longer. It's just different, less forward-confident in conversation and action.